netdev - Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] mpls: don't build sysctl related code when sysctl is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3dd078f1-c8a7-6b9f-b14c-444b48eda3ab@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:46:16 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] mpls: don't build sysctl related code when
 sysctl is disabled

On 6/7/19 12:20 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> This would explain why so much code went under the #ifdef.
> Should we select or depend on sysctl maybe?

I think so