netdev - Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 1/5] seg6: Fix TLV definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <215ec4c5-bef0-f34e-20d5-3c35df0719f4@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 Jun 2019 10:50:55 +0100
From:   David Lebrun <dav.lebrun@...il.com>
To:     Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dlebrun@...gle.com
Cc:     Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 1/5] seg6: Fix TLV definitions

On 07/06/2019 19:55, Tom Herbert wrote:
> -#define SR6_TLV_PADDING		4

 From a uapi perspective, should we rather keep the definition and mark 
it as obsoleted as for the rest of the TLV types ?

Note that I'm fine with both.