lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190609235711.481bbac9@wiggum>
Date:   Sun, 9 Jun 2019 23:57:11 +0200
From:   Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
To:     H Buus <ubuntu@...us.com>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Should b44_init lead to WARN_ON in
 drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c:464?

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 17:44:10 -0400
H Buus <ubuntu@...us.com> wrote:

> I have an old 32 bit laptop with a BCM4401-B0 100Base-TX ethernet
> controller. For every kernel from 4.19-rc1 going forward, I get a
> warning and call trace within a few seconds of start up (see dmesg
> snippet below). I have traced it to a specific commit (see commit
> below). On the face of it, I would think it is a regression, but it
> doesn't seem to cause a problem, since networking over ethernet is working.


This warning is not a problem. The commit just exposes a warning, that
has always been there.
I suggest we just remove the WARN_ON from ssb_gpio_init and
ssb_gpio_unregister.
I don't see a reason to throw a warning in that case.

-- 
Michael

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ