[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2ff2c77-5c14-4bc4-f59c-7012d272ec76@thinci.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:14:56 +0000
From: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...nci.com>
To: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"marex@...x.de" <marex@...x.de>,
"stefan@...er.ch" <stefan@...er.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"b.zolnierkie@...sung.com" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
"a.hajda@...sung.com" <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] drivers: media: coda: fix warning same module names
On 10/06/2019 14:03, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 12:13, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/6/19 11:47 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
>>> When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA and CONFIG_CODA_FS enabled as
>>> loadable modules, we see the following warning:
>>>
>>> warning: same module names found:
>>> fs/coda/coda.ko
>>> drivers/media/platform/coda/coda.ko
>>>
>>> Rework so media coda matches the config fragment. Leaving CODA_FS as is
>>> since thats a well known module.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
>>> index 54e9a73a92ab..588e6bf7c190 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/Makefile
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>
>>> -coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o
>>> +video-coda-objs := coda-common.o coda-bit.o coda-gdi.o coda-h264.o coda-mpeg2.o coda-mpeg4.o coda-jpeg.o
>>>
>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += coda.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_CODA) += video-coda.o
>>
>> How about imx-coda? video-coda suggests it is part of the video subsystem,
>> which it isn't.
>
> I'll resend a v2 shortly with imx-coda instead.
What about other vendor SoCs implementing the Coda IP block which are
not an imx? I'd prefer a more generic name - maybe media-coda.
Thanks,
Matt
>
>
> Cheers,
> Anders
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_VDOA) += imx-vdoa.o
>>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists