[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJahCJcdu=+fA=ewbGezuEJ2W6uwMVxkQpdY6w+1OWVVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:59:29 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] dt-bindings: net: sun4i-emac: Convert the
binding to a schemas
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - interrupts
> > + - clocks
> > + - phy
> > + - allwinner,sram
>
> Quoting ethernet.txt:
>
> - phy: the same as "phy-handle" property, not recommended for new bindings.
>
> - phy-handle: phandle, specifies a reference to a node representing a PHY
> device; this property is described in the Devicetree Specification and so
> preferred;
>
> Can this be expressed in Yaml? Accept phy, but give a warning. Accept
> phy-handle without a warning? Enforce that one or the other is
> present?
The common schema could have 'phy: false'. This works as long as we've
updated (or plan to) all the dts files to use phy-handle. The issue is
how far back do you need kernels to work with newer dtbs.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists