[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190611095143.2810-2-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:51:42 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
mw@...ihalf.com, Yuri Chipchev <yuric@...vell.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] net: mvpp2: prs: Fix parser range for VID filtering
VID filtering is implemented in the Header Parser, with one range of 11
vids being assigned for each no-loopback port.
Make sure we use the per-port range when looking for existing entries in
the Parser.
Since we used a global range instead of a per-port one, this causes VIDs
to be removed from the whitelist from all ports of the same PPv2
instance.
Fixes: 56beda3db602 ("net: mvpp2: Add hardware offloading for VLAN filtering")
Suggested-by: Yuri Chipchev <yuric@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_prs.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_prs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_prs.c
index 392fd895f278..e0da4db3bf56 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_prs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_prs.c
@@ -1905,8 +1905,7 @@ static int mvpp2_prs_ip6_init(struct mvpp2 *priv)
}
/* Find tcam entry with matched pair <vid,port> */
-static int mvpp2_prs_vid_range_find(struct mvpp2 *priv, int pmap, u16 vid,
- u16 mask)
+static int mvpp2_prs_vid_range_find(struct mvpp2_port *port, u16 vid, u16 mask)
{
unsigned char byte[2], enable[2];
struct mvpp2_prs_entry pe;
@@ -1914,13 +1913,13 @@ static int mvpp2_prs_vid_range_find(struct mvpp2 *priv, int pmap, u16 vid,
int tid;
/* Go through the all entries with MVPP2_PRS_LU_VID */
- for (tid = MVPP2_PE_VID_FILT_RANGE_START;
- tid <= MVPP2_PE_VID_FILT_RANGE_END; tid++) {
- if (!priv->prs_shadow[tid].valid ||
- priv->prs_shadow[tid].lu != MVPP2_PRS_LU_VID)
+ for (tid = MVPP2_PRS_VID_PORT_FIRST(port->id);
+ tid <= MVPP2_PRS_VID_PORT_LAST(port->id); tid++) {
+ if (!port->priv->prs_shadow[tid].valid ||
+ port->priv->prs_shadow[tid].lu != MVPP2_PRS_LU_VID)
continue;
- mvpp2_prs_init_from_hw(priv, &pe, tid);
+ mvpp2_prs_init_from_hw(port->priv, &pe, tid);
mvpp2_prs_tcam_data_byte_get(&pe, 2, &byte[0], &enable[0]);
mvpp2_prs_tcam_data_byte_get(&pe, 3, &byte[1], &enable[1]);
@@ -1950,7 +1949,7 @@ int mvpp2_prs_vid_entry_add(struct mvpp2_port *port, u16 vid)
memset(&pe, 0, sizeof(pe));
/* Scan TCAM and see if entry with this <vid,port> already exist */
- tid = mvpp2_prs_vid_range_find(priv, (1 << port->id), vid, mask);
+ tid = mvpp2_prs_vid_range_find(port, vid, mask);
reg_val = mvpp2_read(priv, MVPP2_MH_REG(port->id));
if (reg_val & MVPP2_DSA_EXTENDED)
@@ -2008,7 +2007,7 @@ void mvpp2_prs_vid_entry_remove(struct mvpp2_port *port, u16 vid)
int tid;
/* Scan TCAM and see if entry with this <vid,port> already exist */
- tid = mvpp2_prs_vid_range_find(priv, (1 << port->id), vid, 0xfff);
+ tid = mvpp2_prs_vid_range_find(port, vid, 0xfff);
/* No such entry */
if (tid < 0)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists