lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQymT2zPDnmN6jp5NonQqyZHFRdW9CoiRL=MKKEbqVcySkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:23:11 -0400
From:   Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To:     Zhongjie Wang <zwang048@....edu>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Zhiyun Qian <zhiyunq@...ucr.edu>
Subject: Re: tp->copied_seq used before assignment in tcp_check_urg

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 AM Zhongjie Wang <zwang048@....edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> Thanks for your valuable feedback! Yes, I think you are right.
> It seems not a problem if tp->urg_data and tp->urg_seq are used together.
> From our test results, we can only see there are some paths requiring
> specific initial sequence number to reach.
> But as you said, it would not cause a difference in the code logic.
> We haven't observed any abnormal states.

Great. Thanks for confirming!

cheers,
neal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ