[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQymT2zPDnmN6jp5NonQqyZHFRdW9CoiRL=MKKEbqVcySkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:23:11 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Zhongjie Wang <zwang048@....edu>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Zhiyun Qian <zhiyunq@...ucr.edu>
Subject: Re: tp->copied_seq used before assignment in tcp_check_urg
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 AM Zhongjie Wang <zwang048@....edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> Thanks for your valuable feedback! Yes, I think you are right.
> It seems not a problem if tp->urg_data and tp->urg_seq are used together.
> From our test results, we can only see there are some paths requiring
> specific initial sequence number to reach.
> But as you said, it would not cause a difference in the code logic.
> We haven't observed any abnormal states.
Great. Thanks for confirming!
cheers,
neal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists