netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/sched: Introduce action ct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877e9sgmp1.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:34:50 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@...lanox.com>,
        Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
        Zhike Wang <wangzhike@...com>
Cc:     Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>,
        "nst-kernel\@redhat.com" <nst-kernel@...hat.com>,
        John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Justin Pettit <jpettit@....org>,
        Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/sched: Introduce action ct

Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com> writes:

> On 6/11/2019 4:59 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com> writes:
>>
>>> Allow sending a packet to conntrack and set conntrack zone, mark,
>>> labels and nat parameters.
>> How is this different from the newly merged ctinfo action?
>>
>> -Toke
>
> Hi,
>
> ctinfo does one of two very specific things,
>
> 1) copies DSCP values that have been placed in the firewall conntrack 
> mark back into the IPv4/v6 diffserv field
>
> 2) copies the firewall conntrack mark to the skb's mark field (like 
> act_connmark)
>
> Originally ctinfo action was named conndscp (then conntrack, which is 
> what our ct shorthand stands for).
>
> We also talked about merging both at some point, but they seem only 
> coincidentally related.

Well, I'm predicting it will create some confusion to have them so
closely named... Not sure what the best way to fix that is, though...?

-Toke