[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190611163800.64730-5-jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:37:51 +0200
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 04/13] s390/qeth: restart pending READ cmd from callback
The completion of a pending READ cmd is processed via
qeth_issue_next_read_cb(). Let this callback also start the next READ
cmd, instead of hardcoding that step into the IRQ handler.
While at it remove the check of the channel state,
__qeth_issue_next_read() already does this.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index feb9e1c9d506..fade84112e80 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -851,6 +851,7 @@ static void qeth_issue_next_read_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
QETH_PDU_HEADER_SEQ_NO(iob->data),
QETH_SEQ_NO_LENGTH);
qeth_release_buffer(channel, iob);
+ __qeth_issue_next_read(card);
}
static int qeth_set_thread_start_bit(struct qeth_card *card,
@@ -1115,9 +1116,6 @@ static void qeth_irq(struct ccw_device *cdev, unsigned long intparm,
}
if (channel == &card->data)
return;
- if (channel == &card->read &&
- channel->state == CH_STATE_UP)
- __qeth_issue_next_read(card);
if (iob && iob->callback)
iob->callback(card, iob->channel, iob);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists