[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190612150644.GA22002@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:06:44 +0200
From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, Eyal Reizer <eyalr@...com>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Spyridon Papageorgiou <spapageorgiou@...adit-jv.com>,
Joshua Frkuska <joshua_frkuska@...tor.com>,
"George G . Davis" <george_davis@...tor.com>,
Andrey Gusakov <andrey.gusakov@...entembedded.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wlcore/wl18xx: Add invert-irq OF property for physically
inverted IRQ
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your comment.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:17:10AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:00:41AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
[..]
> > > We already have plenty of that in the tree, the canonical example
> > > probably being drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c. It should be pretty
> > > easy to turn this driver into something more generic.
> >
> > I don't think drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c can serve the
> > use-case/purpose of this patch. The MTK driver seems to be dealing with
> > the polarity inversion of on-SoC interrupts which are routed to GiC,
> > whereas in this patch we are talking about an off-chip interrupt
> > wired to R-Car GPIO controller.
>
> And how different is that? The location of the interrupt source is
> pretty irrelevant here.
The main difference which I sense is that a driver like irq-mtk-sysirq
mostly (if not exclusively) deals with internal kernel implementation
detail (tuned via DT) whilst adding an inverter for GPIO IRQs raises
a whole bunch of new questions (e.g. how to arbitrate between
kernel-space and user-space IRQ polarity configuration?).
> The point is that there is already a general
> scheme to deal with these "signal altering widgets", and that we
> should try to reuse at least the concept, if not the code.
Since Harish Jenny K N might be working on a new driver doing GPIO IRQ
inversion, I have CC-ed him as well to avoid any overlapping work.
>
> > It looks to me that the nice DTS sketch shared by Linus Walleij in [5]
> > might come closer to the concept proposed by Geert? FWIW, the
> > infrastructure/implementation to make this possible is still not
> > ready.
>
> Which looks like what I'm suggesting.
Then we are on the same page. Thanks.
>
> M.
>
> --
> Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
--
Best Regards,
Eugeniu.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists