netdev - Re: [PATCH][next] xfrm: fix missing break on AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190612104019.2f6x72wa2qdxw5p3@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:40:19 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] xfrm: fix missing break on AF_INET6 case

Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> It appears that there is a missing break statement for the AF_INET6 case
> that falls through to the default WARN_ONCE case. I don't think that is
> intentional. Fix this by adding in the missing break.

Yes, I sent same patch a few minutes ago:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1114377/

I don't mind which one gets applied.