[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190612131647.GD23615@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:16:47 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: net: dsa: fix warning same module names
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:36:44PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:11 AM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > When building with CONFIG_NET_DSA_REALTEK_SMI and CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY
> > enabled as loadable modules, we see the following warning:
> >
> > warning: same module names found:
> > drivers/net/phy/realtek.ko
> > drivers/net/dsa/realtek.ko
> >
> > Rework so the driver name is rtl8366 instead of realtek.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
>
> Sorry for giving bad advice here on IRC... my wrong.
>
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_REALTEK_SMI) += realtek.o
> > -realtek-objs := realtek-smi.o rtl8366.o rtl8366rb.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_REALTEK_SMI) += rtl8366.o
> > +rtl8366-objs := realtek-smi.o rtl8366-common.o rtl8366rb.o
>
> What is common for this family is not the name rtl8366
> (there is for example rtl8369 in this family, we just haven't
> added it yet) but the common technical item is SMI.
Hi Linus
I was not sure about this. I thought SMI was the bus used to
communicate with the switch. It just seemed odd to call a switch
family after the bus.
Anyway, if you are happy with the name realtek-smi:
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists