| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190613042003.3791852-8-ast@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:20:01 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <daniel@...earbox.net>, <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
<ecree@...arflare.com>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<andriin@...com>, <jannh@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: add basic verifier tests for loops
This set of tests is a rewrite of Edward's earlier tests:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/877221/
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 161 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5e980a5ab69d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/loops1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+{
+ "bounded loop, count to 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .retval = 4,
+},
+{
+ "bounded loop, count to 20",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 3),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 20, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+ "bounded loop, count from positive unknown to 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .retval = 4,
+},
+{
+ "bounded loop, count from totally unknown to 4",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+ "bounded loop, count to 4 with equality",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+ "bounded loop, start in the middle",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_A(1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "back-edge",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .retval = 4,
+},
+{
+ "bounded loop containing a forward jump",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -3),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+ .retval = 4,
+},
+{
+ "bounded loop that jumps out rather than in",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, 10000, 2),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_JMP_A(-4),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+ "infinite loop after a conditional jump",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 5),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, 2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_A(-2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "program is too large",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+ "bounded recursion",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, 4, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, -5),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "back-edge",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+ "infinite loop in two jumps",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_A(0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 4, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "loop detected",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
+{
+ "infinite loop: three-jump trick",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 2, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 2, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_0, 2, -11),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "loop detected",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+},
--
2.20.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists