| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190613042003.3791852-3-ast@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 21:19:56 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <daniel@...earbox.net>, <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
<ecree@...arflare.com>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<andriin@...com>, <jannh@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/9] selftests/bpf: fix tests due to const spill/fill
fix tests that incorrectly assumed that the verifier
cannot track constants through stack.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
.../bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c | 3 +-
.../bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c | 28 ++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
index d5c596fdc4b9..2c5fbe7bcd27 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
@@ -511,7 +511,8 @@
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0xffffffff),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10, -8),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_0, 0xffff),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c
index 1f39d845c64f..67ab12410050 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, bitwise AND, zero included",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, -128),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_2, 64),
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, bitwise AND + JMP, wrong max",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, -128),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_2, 65),
@@ -122,9 +122,9 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, JMP, bounds + offset",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, -128),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 64, 5),
@@ -143,9 +143,9 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, JMP, wrong max",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, -128),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 65, 4),
@@ -163,9 +163,9 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, JMP, no max check",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, -128),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
@@ -183,9 +183,9 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, JMP, no min check",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, -128),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, 64, 3),
@@ -201,9 +201,9 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, JMP (signed), no min check",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, -128),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, 64, 3),
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: map, JMP, wrong max",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
@@ -251,7 +252,7 @@
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 10),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10, -128),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) + 1, 4),
@@ -262,7 +263,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
+ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=0 size=49",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
@@ -296,6 +297,7 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: map adjusted, JMP, wrong max",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0),
@@ -304,7 +306,7 @@
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 11),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 20),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10, -128),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) - 19, 4),
@@ -315,7 +317,7 @@
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
+ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 },
.errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the array range",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
@@ -337,8 +339,8 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: size > 0 not allowed on NULL (ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10, -128),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_2, 64),
@@ -562,6 +564,7 @@
{
"helper access to variable memory: 8 bytes leak",
.insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -64),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -572,7 +575,6 @@
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -24),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -16),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -128),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10, -128),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_2, 63),
--
2.20.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists