netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add test for SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190612221549.7rmv56yjg7a64zad@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:15:52 +0000
From:   Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
CC:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add test for SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 02:53:35PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 6/12/19 2:47 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >>>> CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(BPFDIR) -I$(GENDIR) $(GENFLAGS) -I../../../include \
> >>>> +	  -I../../../../usr/include/  \
> >>> Why not copy inlude/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h into tools/include
> >>> instead? Will that work?
> >> Sure. I am ok with copy.  I don't think we need to sync very often.
> >> Do you know how to do that considering multiple arch's socket.h
> >> have been changed in Patch 1?
> > No, I don't know how to handle arch specific stuff. I suggest to copy
> > asm-generic and have ifdefs in the tests if someone complains:-)
It is not very nice but I am ok with that also.  It is the only
arch I can test ;)

> > 
> >> Is copy better?
> > Doesn't ../../../../usr/include provide the same headers we have in
> > tools/include/uapi? If you add -I../../../../usr/include, then is there
> > a point of having copies under tools/include/uapi? I don't really
> > know why we keep the copies under tools/include/uapi rather than including
> > ../../../usr/include directly.
> 
> for out-of-src builds ../../../../usr/include/ directory doesn't exist.
Is out-of-src build mostly for libbpf?
or selftests/bpf also requires out-of-src build?