[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190613120411.35ef3c52@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:04:11 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Cc: bjorn.topel@...el.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
bruce.richardson@...el.com, ciara.loftus@...el.com,
xiaolong.ye@...el.com, qi.z.zhang@...el.com, maximmi@...lanox.com,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, kevin.laatz@...el.com,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, kiran.patil@...el.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] xsk: add support for need_wakeup flag in
AF_XDP rings
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:37:26 +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
>
> - if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf ||
> - !dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_async_xmit) {
> + if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf || !dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_wakeup) {
> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto err_unreg_umem;
> }
> @@ -198,7 +258,8 @@ static int xsk_zc_xmit(struct sock *sk)
> struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk);
> struct net_device *dev = xs->dev;
>
> - return dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_async_xmit(dev, xs->queue_id);
> + return dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_wakeup(dev, xs->queue_id,
> + XDP_WAKEUP_TX);
> }
>
> static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
Those two look like they should be in the previous patch? Won't it
break build?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists