lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190613120411.35ef3c52@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:04:11 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Cc:     bjorn.topel@...el.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        bruce.richardson@...el.com, ciara.loftus@...el.com,
        xiaolong.ye@...el.com, qi.z.zhang@...el.com, maximmi@...lanox.com,
        sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, kevin.laatz@...el.com,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, kiran.patil@...el.com,
        axboe@...nel.dk, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
        maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] xsk: add support for need_wakeup flag in
 AF_XDP rings

On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:37:26 +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
>  
> -	if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf ||
> -	    !dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_async_xmit) {
> +	if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bpf || !dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_wakeup) {
>  		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  		goto err_unreg_umem;
>  	}

> @@ -198,7 +258,8 @@ static int xsk_zc_xmit(struct sock *sk)
>  	struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk);
>  	struct net_device *dev = xs->dev;
>  
> -	return dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_async_xmit(dev, xs->queue_id);
> +	return dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_wakeup(dev, xs->queue_id,
> +					       XDP_WAKEUP_TX);
>  }
>  
>  static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)

Those two look like they should be in the previous patch?  Won't it
break build?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ