[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNh3KcoZC5W6CLgnx2tzH41Kz11Zs__2QkOKF+CyEMzdMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:58:52 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <bsd@...com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/17] AF_XDP infrastructure improvements and
mlx5e support
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 22:49, Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:56:33 +0000, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> > UAPI is not changed, XSK RX queues are exposed to the kernel. The lower
> > half of the available amount of RX queues are regular queues, and the
> > upper half are XSK RX queues.
>
> If I have 32 queues enabled on the NIC and I install AF_XDP socket on
> queue 10, does the NIC now have 64 RQs, but only first 32 are in the
> normal RSS map?
>
Additional, related, question to Jakub's: Say that I'd like to hijack
all 32 Rx queues of the NIC. I create 32 AF_XDP socket and attach them
in zero-copy mode to the device. What's the result?
> > The patch "xsk: Extend channels to support combined XSK/non-XSK
> > traffic" was dropped. The final patch was reworked accordingly.
>
> The final patches has 2k LoC, kind of hard to digest. You can also
> post the clean up patches separately, no need for large series here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists