[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ad9dd803e3d961fef3ceaf77215f27e02b04981.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:49:15 +0200
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
To: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@...lanox.com>,
Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
Zhike Wang <wangzhike@...com>
Cc: Justin Pettit <jpettit@....org>,
John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>, nst-kernel@...hat.com,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/sched: Introduce action ct
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 12:16 +0200, Davide Caratti wrote:
> hello Paul!
>
> On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 16:28 +0300, Paul Blakey wrote:
>
> > +#endif /* __NET_TC_CT_H */
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
> > index a93680f..c5264d7 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
> > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ enum {
> > #define TCA_ACT_SIMP 22
> > #define TCA_ACT_IFE 25
> > #define TCA_ACT_SAMPLE 26
> > +#define TCA_ACT_CT 27
>
> ^^ I think you can't use 27 (act_ctinfo forgot to explicitly define it),
> or the uAPI will break. See below:
[...]
Nevermind, I just read the comment above the definition of TCA_ACT_GACT.
> >
> so, I think you should use 28. And I will send a patch for net-next now
> that adds the missing define for TCA_ID_CTINFO. Ok?
we don't need to patch pkt_cls.h. Just avoid
#define TCA_ACT_CT 27
and the assignment in the enum, that should be sufficient.
--
davide
Powered by blists - more mailing lists