[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57f6e69da6b3461a9c39d71aa1b58662@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:50:23 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Alexei Starovoitov' <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
"Kairui Song" <kasong@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/9] x86/bpf: Fix JIT frame pointer usage
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:21:03AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> The BPF JIT code clobbers RBP. This breaks frame pointer convention and
> thus prevents the FP unwinder from unwinding through JIT generated code.
>
> RBP is currently used as the BPF stack frame pointer register. The
> actual register used is opaque to the user, as long as it's a
> callee-saved register. Change it to use R12 instead.
Could you maintain the system %rbp chain through the BPF stack?
It might even be possible to put something relevant in the %rip
location.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists