[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1906141420280.9068@hadrien>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:21:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
cc: aviad.krawczyk@...wei.com, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hinic: Use devm_kasprintf instead of hard coding
it
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a:
>
> <aviad.krawczyk@...wei.com>: host huawei.com[103.218.216.136] said: 550
> 5.1.1 Error: invalid recipients is found from 80.12.242.127
>
> However, MAINTAINERS has:
> HUAWEI ETHERNET DRIVER
> M: Aviad Krawczyk <aviad.krawczyk@...wei.com>
> L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> S: Supported
> F: Documentation/networking/hinic.txt
> F: drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/
>
> I don't know how this should be fixed (neither if it should be...), so if s.o.
> knows, please do.
Maybe this person would know, since he is also from Huawei and has signed
off on a patch by Aviad Krawczyk:
cde66f24c3bf42123647c5233447c5790d92557f
Signed-off-by: Zhao Chen <zhaochen6@...wei.com>
julia
>
> Best regards,
> Christophe Jaillet
>
> Le 13/06/2019 à 21:54, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
> > 'devm_kasprintf' is less verbose than:
> > snprintf(NULL, 0, ...);
> > devm_kzalloc(...);
> > sprintf
> > so use it instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c | 8 +++-----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c
> > index 9b4082557ad5..95b09fd110d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c
> > @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ int hinic_init_rxq(struct hinic_rxq *rxq, struct
> > hinic_rq *rq,
> > struct net_device *netdev)
> > {
> > struct hinic_qp *qp = container_of(rq, struct hinic_qp, rq);
> > - int err, pkts, irqname_len;
> > + int err, pkts;
> > rxq->netdev = netdev;
> > rxq->rq = rq;
> > @@ -502,13 +502,11 @@ int hinic_init_rxq(struct hinic_rxq *rxq, struct
> > hinic_rq *rq,
> > rxq_stats_init(rxq);
> > - irqname_len = snprintf(NULL, 0, "hinic_rxq%d", qp->q_id) + 1;
> > - rxq->irq_name = devm_kzalloc(&netdev->dev, irqname_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + rxq->irq_name = devm_kasprintf(&netdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> > + "hinic_rxq%d", qp->q_id);
> > if (!rxq->irq_name)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > - sprintf(rxq->irq_name, "hinic_rxq%d", qp->q_id);
> > -
> > pkts = rx_alloc_pkts(rxq);
> > if (!pkts) {
> > err = -ENOMEM;
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists