[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1560534694.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:56:39 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: x86@...nel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/bpf: unwinder fixes
v2:
- Simplified the frame pointer fixes - instead of using R12, just
continue to use RBP for BPF_REG_FP, but use nested frames so the
unwinder can understand (suggested by David Laight).
- Dropped the AT&T syntax patches for now. I'm about to disappear for a
week and I don't have time to argue about whether code readability is
a good thing.
- I can do the 32-bit version of the fix when I get back. It should be
easy enough.
v1 is here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1560431531.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Josh Poimboeuf (4):
objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code
x86/bpf: Move epilogue generation to a dedicated function
x86/bpf: Fix 64-bit JIT frame pointer usage
x86/unwind/orc: Fall back to using frame pointers for generated code
Song Liu (1):
perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel()
arch/x86/events/core.c | 10 +--
arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 26 ++++++--
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 +-
tools/objtool/check.c | 16 ++++-
5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists