netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: sk_storage: Fix out of bounds memory access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQK6=90Yu6jhEhE52ptS4vgbRVpyj2oZZsO6gcrScU9bsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 Jun 2019 14:45:03 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Arthur Fabre <afabre@...udflare.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: sk_storage: Fix out of bounds memory access

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:36 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Force the minimum number of locks to two.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@...udflare.com>
> >> Fixes: 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")
>
> The offending commit is already in Linus tree hence if so bpf tree. Arthur, please
> elaborate why bpf-next is targeted specifically here?

It's certainly should be in bpf tree.
It didn't apply directly, so I tweaked it a tiny bit,
reduced verbosity of commit log and pushed to bpf tree.
Thanks for the fix!