[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08e102a0-8051-e582-56c8-d721bfc9e8b9@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 16:16:07 +0000
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Ran Rozenstein <ranro@...lanox.com>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: ipv4: remove erroneous advancement of
list pointer
On 6/17/2019 5:02 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Tariq reported a soft lockup on net-next that Mellanox was able to
> bisect to 2638eb8b50cf ("net: ipv4: provide __rcu annotation for ifa_list").
>
> While reviewing above patch I found a regression when addresses have a
> lifetime specified.
>
> Second patch extends rtnetlink.sh to trigger crash
> (without first patch applied).
>
Thanks Florian.
Ran, can you please test?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists