[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190618.092512.1610110055396742434.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dsahern@...il.com
Cc: sbrivio@...hat.com, jishi@...hat.com, weiwan@...gle.com,
kafai@...com, edumazet@...gle.com,
matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5 0/6] Fix listing (IPv4, IPv6) and flushing
(IPv6) of cached route exceptions
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:51:01 -0600
> Changing the dump code has been notoriously tricky to get right in one
> go, no matter how much testing you have done. Given that I think this
> should go to net-next first and once it proves ok there we can look at a
> backport to stable trees.
I agree, this is probably the wisest way forward with these changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists