[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190618063937.GB24549@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:39:37 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf trace: Handle NULL pointer dereference in
trace__syscall_info()
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:32:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 05:11:40PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > trace__init_bpf_map_syscall_args() invokes trace__syscall_info() to
> > retrieve system calls information, it always passes NULL for 'evsel'
> > argument; when id is an invalid value then the logging will try to
> > output event name, this triggers NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > This patch directly uses string "unknown" for event name when 'evsel'
> > is NULL pointer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index 5cd74651db4c..49dfb2fd393b 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ static struct syscall *trace__syscall_info(struct trace *trace,
> > static u64 n;
> >
> > pr_debug("Invalid syscall %d id, skipping (%s, %" PRIu64 ")\n",
> > - id, perf_evsel__name(evsel), ++n);
> > + id, evsel ? perf_evsel__name(evsel) : "unknown", ++n);
> > return NULL;
>
> What do you think of this instead?
Yes, I agree the below change is right thing to do. FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
BTW, my patch followed the code in [1], after apply below your change,
could consider to simplify code in [1] for without checking 'evsel' is
NULL pointer anymore.
Thanks,
Leo
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/builtin-report.c?h=perf/core#n301
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 68beef8f47ff..1d6af95b9207 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,9 @@ const char *perf_evsel__name(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> {
> char bf[128];
>
> + if (!evsel)
> + goto out_unknown;
> +
> if (evsel->name)
> return evsel->name;
>
> @@ -629,7 +632,10 @@ const char *perf_evsel__name(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
>
> evsel->name = strdup(bf);
>
> - return evsel->name ?: "unknown";
> + if (evsel->name)
> + return evsel->name;
> +out_unknown:
> + return "unknown";
> }
>
> const char *perf_evsel__group_name(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists