lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd0b0a87b8bc459e172ad9396931bb69697da6c9.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:29:59 -0400
From:   Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kda@...ux-powerpc.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        mkubecek@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/2] ipoib: show VF broadcast address

On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 10:08 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:53:41 +0200
> 
> > in IPoIB case we can't see a VF broadcast address for but
> > can see for PF
> 
> I just want to understand why this need to see the VF broadcast
> address is IPoIB specific?

A VF might or might not have the same security domain (P_Key) as the
parent, and the P_Key is encoded in the broadcast address.  In the
event that two vfs or a vf and a pf can't see each other over the IPoIB
network, it is necessary to be able to see the broadcast address in use
by each to make sure they are the same and not that they shouldn't be
able to see each other because they are on different P_Keys and
therefore different broadcast multicast groups.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57
2FDD

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ