netdev - arm32 build failure after 992aa864dca068554802a65a467a2640985cc213

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:46:04 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To:     Shalom Toledo <shalomt@...lanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: arm32 build failure after 992aa864dca068554802a65a467a2640985cc213

Hi all,

A 32-bit ARM allyesconfig fails to link after commit 992aa864dca0
("mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Add implementation for physical hardware clock
operations") because of 64-bit division:

arm-linux-gnueabi-ld:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.o: in function
`mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_settime':
spectrum_ptp.c:(.text+0x39c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'

The following diff fixes it but I have no idea if it is proper or not
(hence reaching out before sending it, in case one of you has a more
proper idea).

Cheers,
Nathan

---

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c
index 2a9bbc90225e..65686f0b6834 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_settime(struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock, u64 nsec)
        u32 next_sec;
        int err;
 
-       next_sec = nsec / NSEC_PER_SEC + 1;
+       next_sec = (u32)div64_u64(nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC + 1);
        next_sec_in_nsec = next_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC;
 
        spin_lock(&clock->lock);