[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190619111254.GA4225@khorivan>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:12:55 +0300
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
"toshiaki.makita1@...il.com" <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>,
"grygorii.strashko@...com" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"mcroce@...hat.com" <mcroce@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 08/11] xdp: tracking page_pool resources and
safe removal
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:54:07PM +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
Hi, Jesper
>On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 05:19:51PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
[...]
>>If we had to allow page_pool to be registered twice, via
>>xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() then I guess we could extend page_pool
>>with a usage/users reference count, and then only really free the
>>page_pool when refcnt reach zero. But it just seems and looks wrong
>>(in the code) as the hole trick to get performance is to only have one
>>user.
Let's try this variant. This might be used only in case if no choice.
If no issues and provide appropriate comments in the code it can look
more a while normal.
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists