[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190619124433.GC26784@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:44:33 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Voon, Weifeng" <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"Gomes, Vinicius" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/5] net: stmmac: introduce IEEE 802.1Qbv
configuration functionalities
> > It looks like most o the TSN_WARN should actually be netdev_dbg().
> >
> > Andrew
>
> Hi Andrew,
> This file is targeted for dual licensing which is GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause.
> This is the reason why we are using wrappers around the functions so that
> all the function call is generic.
I don't see why dual licenses should require wrappers. Please explain.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists