[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190619030729.GA26784@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 05:07:29 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/5] net: stmmac: introduce IEEE 802.1Qbv
configuration functionalities
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:36:14AM +0800, Voon Weifeng wrote:
Hi Voon
> +static int est_poll_srwo(void *ioaddr)
> +{
> + /* Poll until the EST GCL Control[SRWO] bit clears.
> + * Total wait = 12 x 50ms ~= 0.6s.
> + */
> + unsigned int retries = 12;
> + unsigned int value;
> +
> + do {
> + value = TSN_RD32(ioaddr + MTL_EST_GCL_CTRL);
> + if (!(value & MTL_EST_GCL_CTRL_SRWO))
> + return 0;
> + msleep(50);
> + } while (--retries);
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
Maybe use one of the readx_poll_timeout() macros?
> +static int est_read_gce(void *ioaddr, unsigned int row,
> + unsigned int *gates, unsigned int *ti_nsec,
> + unsigned int dbgb, unsigned int dbgm)
> +{
> + struct tsn_hw_cap *cap = &dw_tsn_hwcap;
> + unsigned int ti_wid = cap->ti_wid;
> + unsigned int gates_mask;
> + unsigned int ti_mask;
> + unsigned int value;
> + int ret;
> +
> + gates_mask = (1 << cap->txqcnt) - 1;
> + ti_mask = (1 << ti_wid) - 1;
> +
> + ret = est_read_gcl_config(ioaddr, &value, row, 0, dbgb, dbgm);
> + if (ret) {
> + TSN_ERR("Read GCE failed! row=%u\n", row);
It is generally not a good idea to put wrappers around the kernel
print functions. It would be better if all these functions took struct
stmmac_priv *priv rather than ioaddr, so you could then do
netdev_err(priv->dev, "Read GCE failed! row=%u\n", row);
> + /* Ensure that HW is not in the midst of GCL transition */
> + value = TSN_RD32(ioaddr + MTL_EST_CTRL);
Also, don't put wrapper around readl()/writel().
> + value &= ~MTL_EST_CTRL_SSWL;
> +
> + /* MTL_EST_CTRL value has been read earlier, if TILS value
> + * differs, we update here.
> + */
> + if (tils != dw_tsn_hwtunable[TSN_HWTUNA_TX_EST_TILS]) {
> + value &= ~MTL_EST_CTRL_TILS;
> + value |= (tils << MTL_EST_CTRL_TILS_SHIFT);
> +
> + TSN_WR32(value, ioaddr + MTL_EST_CTRL);
> + dw_tsn_hwtunable[TSN_HWTUNA_TX_EST_TILS] = tils;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int est_set_ov(void *ioaddr,
> + const unsigned int *ptov,
> + const unsigned int *ctov)
> +{
> + unsigned int value;
> +
> + if (!dw_tsn_feat_en[TSN_FEAT_ID_EST])
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + value = TSN_RD32(ioaddr + MTL_EST_CTRL);
> + value &= ~MTL_EST_CTRL_SSWL;
> +
> + if (ptov) {
> + if (*ptov > EST_PTOV_MAX) {
> + TSN_WARN("EST: invalid PTOV(%u), max=%u\n",
> + *ptov, EST_PTOV_MAX);
It looks like most o the TSN_WARN should actually be netdev_dbg().
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists