lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:46:05 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com> To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH][bpf-next] bpf: verifier: add a break statement in switch On 6/19/19 12:44 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:07 AM Gustavo A. R. Silva > <gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote: >> >> Notice that in this case, it's much clearer to explicitly add a break >> rather than letting the code to fall through. It also avoid potential >> future fall-through warnings[1]. >> >> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable >> -Wimplicit-fallthrough. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1087056/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com> >> --- > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> > Thanks, Andrii. -- Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists