[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190618.210125.383827657449306914.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:01:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: colin.king@...onical.com
Cc: dchickles@...vell.com, sburla@...vell.com, fmanlunas@...vell.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] net: lio_core: fix potential sign-extension
overflow on large shift
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:12:49 +0100
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Left shifting the signed int value 1 by 31 bits has undefined behaviour
> and the shift amount oq_no can be as much as 63. Fix this by using
> BIT_ULL(oq_no) instead.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Bad shift operation")
> Fixes: f21fb3ed364b ("Add support of Cavium Liquidio ethernet adapters")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>
> V2: Use BIT_ULL(oq_no) instead of 1ULL << oq_no. Thanks to Dan Carpenter for
> noting this is more appropriate.
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists