[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1560931034-6810-2-git-send-email-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:57:14 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: jaswinder.singh@...aro.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
masahisa.kojima@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: [net-next, PATCH 2/2] net: netsec: remove loops in napi Rx process
netsec_process_rx was running in a loop trying to process as many packets
as possible before re-enabling interrupts. With the recent DMA changes
this is not needed anymore as we manage to consume all the budget without
looping over the function.
Since it has no performance penalty let's remove that and simplify the Rx
path a bit
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 11 ++---------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
index a10ef700f16d..48fd7448b513 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
@@ -820,19 +820,12 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, int budget)
static int netsec_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
struct netsec_priv *priv;
- int rx, done, todo;
+ int done;
priv = container_of(napi, struct netsec_priv, napi);
netsec_process_tx(priv);
-
- todo = budget;
- do {
- rx = netsec_process_rx(priv, todo);
- todo -= rx;
- } while (rx);
-
- done = budget - todo;
+ done = netsec_process_rx(priv, budget);
if (done < budget && napi_complete_done(napi, done)) {
unsigned long flags;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists