[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <18a49a3a5d0274df90f059f37d3601abd0bac879.1560987611.git.sbrivio@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 01:59:46 +0200
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Jianlin Shi <jishi@...hat.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 06/11] ipv6/route: Don't match on fc_nh_id if not set in ip6_route_del()
If fc_nh_id isn't set, we shouldn't try to match against it. This
actually matters just for the RTF_CACHE case below (where this is
already handled): if iproute2 gets a route exception and tries to
delete it, it won't reference its fc_nh_id, even if a nexthop
object might be associated to the originating route.
Fixes: 5b98324ebe29 ("ipv6: Allow routes to use nexthop objects")
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
---
v6: New patch
net/ipv6/route.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index c4d285fe0adc..86859023cd01 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -3827,7 +3827,8 @@ static int ip6_route_del(struct fib6_config *cfg,
for_each_fib6_node_rt_rcu(fn) {
struct fib6_nh *nh;
- if (rt->nh && rt->nh->id != cfg->fc_nh_id)
+ if (rt->nh && cfg->fc_nh_id &&
+ rt->nh->id != cfg->fc_nh_id)
continue;
if (cfg->fc_flags & RTF_CACHE) {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists