[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+frnYN6E5zyrNvbnhQ_XgvrEEtghiS7DOKoe6o_ErYRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:52:29 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@...dv.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: 6c409a3aee: kernel_selftests.bpf.test_verifier.fail
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 1:36 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> # #340/p direct packet access: test22 (x += pkt_ptr, 3) OK
> # #341/p direct packet access: test23 (x += pkt_ptr, 4) FAIL
> # Unexpected success to load!
> # verification time 17 usec
> # stack depth 8
> # processed 18 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 0
> # #342/p direct packet access: test24 (x += pkt_ptr, 5) OK
> # #343/p direct packet access: test25 (marking on <, good access) OK
..
> # #673/p meta access, test9 OK
> # #674/p meta access, test10 FAIL
> # Unexpected success to load!
> # verification time 29 usec
> # stack depth 8
> # processed 19 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 0
> # #675/p meta access, test11 OK
Hi Rong,
the patch quoted is not in bpf-next/net-next.
This patch is work-in-progress that I posted to mailing list
and pushed into my own git branch on kernel.org.
It's awesome that build bot does this early testing.
I really like it.
Would be great if the bot can add a tag to email subject that it's testing
this not yet merged patch.
Right now since the email says
commit: 6c409a3aee945e50c6dd4109689f52
it felt that this is real commit and my initial reaction
was that 'ohh something is broken in the merge code'
which wasn't the case :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists