[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190621150838.en7rkykfq3vui4bd@salvia>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 17:08:38 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: wenxu@...oud.cn
Cc: fw@...len.de, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: bridge: Fix non-untagged fragment
packet
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:35:07PM +0800, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>
> ip netns exec ns1 ip a a dev eth0 10.0.0.7/24
> ip netns exec ns2 ip link a link eth0 name vlan type vlan id 200
> ip netns exec ns2 ip a a dev vlan 10.0.0.8/24
>
> ip l add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> brctl addif br0 veth1
> brctl addif br0 veth2
>
> bridge vlan add dev veth1 vid 200 pvid untagged
> bridge vlan add dev veth2 vid 200
>
> A two fragment packets send from ns2 contained with vlan tag 200.
> In the bridge conntrack, packet will defrag to one skb with fraglist.
> When the packet forward to ns1 through veth1, the first skb vlan tag
> will be cleared for "untagged" flags. But the vlan tag in the second
> skb still tagged, which lead the second fragment send with tag 200 to
> ns1.
> So if the first fragment packet don't contain vlan tag, all of the
> remain should not contain vlan tag..
Applied, thanks for explaining.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists