netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] enable broadcom tagging for bcm531x5 switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f1f45e1d-5079-ab24-87d8-99b8c6710a08@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jun 2019 19:24:10 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@...utronix.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] enable broadcom tagging for bcm531x5 switches



On 6/19/2019 2:18 AM, Benedikt Spranger wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:16:23 -0700
> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> How is that a problem for other machines? Does that lead to some kind
>> of broadcast storm because there are machines that keep trying to
>> respond to ARP solicitations?
> Mirroring broadcast packages on the interface they are coming in, is
> IMHO a poor idea. As a result any switch connected to wan update the
> MAC table and send packages on a port where they do not belong to.
> Just imagine to send a DHCP request. The BPi R1 acts as nearly perfect
> black hole in such a situation.

Fair enough.

> 
>> The few aspects that bother me, not in any particular order, are that:
>>
>> - you might be able to not change anything and just get away with the
>> one line patch below that sets skb->offload_fwd_mark to 1 to indicate
>> to the bridge, not to bother with sending a copy of the packet, since
>> the HW took care of that already
> 
> I can test it, but i like to note that the changed function is not
> executed in case of bcm53125.

Indeed, that won't work, how about implementing port_egress_flood() for
b53? That would make sure that multicast is flooded (as well as unicast)
before the switch port is enslaved into the bridge and this should take
care of both your problem and the lack of multicast flooding once
Broadcom tags are turned on. You might also need to set
skb->fwd_offload_mark accordingly in case you still see duplicate
packets, though that should not happen anymore AFAICT.

Something like this should take care of that (untested). You might have
to explicitly set the IMP port (port 8) in B53_UC_FWD_EN and
B53_MC_FWD_EN, though since you turn on management mode, this may not be
required. I might have some time tomorrow to test that on a Lamobo R1.
-- 
Florian

View attachment "b53-egress-floods.patch" of type "text/plain" (2684 bytes)