[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57de5c6e-b964-70e1-ed60-527f2be2a961@aplu.fr>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:16:59 +0200
From: Aymeric <mulx@...u.fr>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: network unstable on odroid-c1/meson8b.
Le 20/06/2019 à 22:54, Aymeric a écrit :
> Le 20/06/2019 à 17:53, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :
>> On 20.06.2019 09:55, Aymeric wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> On 2019-06-20 00:14, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>>> On 19.06.2019 22:18, Aymeric wrote:
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>> Kernel 3.10 didn't have a dedicated RTL8211F PHY driver yet, therefore
>>>> I assume the genphy driver was used. Do you have a line with
>>>> "attached PHY driver" in dmesg output of the vendor kernel?
>>> No.
>>> Here is the full output of the dmesg from vendor kernel [¹].
>>>
>>> I've also noticed something strange, it might be linked, but mac address of the board is set to a random value when using mainline kernel and I've to set it manually but not when using vendor kernel.
>>>
>>>> The dedicated PHY driver takes care of the tx delay, if the genphy
>>>> driver is used we have to rely on what uboot configured.
>>>> But if we indeed had an issue with a misconfigured delay, I think
>>>> the connection shouldn't be fine with just another link partner.
>>>> Just to have it tested you could make rtl8211f_config_init() in
>>>> drivers/net/phy/realtek.c a no-op (in current kernels).
>>>>
>>> I'm not an expert here, just adding a "return 0;" here[²] would be enough?
>>>
>>>> And you could compare at least the basic PHY registers 0x00 - 0x30
>>>> with both kernel versions, e.g. with phytool.
>>>>
>>> They are not the same but I don't know what I'm looking for, so for kernel 3.10 [³] and for kernel 5.1.12 [⁴].
>>>
>>> Aymeric
>>>
>>> [¹]: https://paste.aplu.fr/?38ef95b44ebdbfc3#G666/YbhgU+O+tdC/2HaimUCigm8ZTB44qvQip/HJ5A=
>>> [²]: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/241e39004581475b2802cd63c111fec43bb0123e/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c#L164
>>> [³]: https://paste.aplu.fr/?2dde1c32d5c68f4c#6xIa8MjTm6jpI6citEJAqFTLMMHDjFZRet/M00/EwjU=
>>> [⁴]: https://paste.aplu.fr/?32130e9bcb05dde7#N/xdnvb5GklcJtiOxMpTCm+9gsUliRwH8X3dcwSV+ng=
>>>
>> The vendor kernel has some, but not really much magic:
>> https://github.com/hardkernel/linux/blob/odroidc-3.10.y/drivers/amlogic/ethernet/phy/am_rtl8211f.c
>> The write to RTL8211F_PHYCR2 is overwritten later, therefore we don't have to consider it.
>>
>> The following should make the current Realtek PHY driver behave like in the vendor driver.
>> Could you test it?
> (sending again for mailing list, sorry, I forgot to force it in plaintext…)
>
> I've applied your patch and tried but it doesn't change anything.
>
> Here is dmesg output and phytool results.
>
> https://paste.aplu.fr/?9735c99907528929#SeCgwR45cgnbDA1tXIVBHCBT8RNct2r41jU6vsguLVc=
>
Hello all,
I had some news from a friend who have the same issue than me, his board
is connected to an "intelligent" switch a Ubiquiti EdgeSwitch.
Also, when he force the link to 100 it is stable.
Aymeric.
--
Aymeric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists