[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_egxQekOXY2aZy_EkyLcEkR9N7Cgd+yd44xFGcCvk9Nog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:11:26 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+afabda3890cc2f765041@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: davem <davem@...emloft.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Subject: Re: memory leak in sctp_v4_create_accept_sk
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:28 PM syzbot
<syzbot+afabda3890cc2f765041@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following crash on:
>
> HEAD commit: abf02e29 Merge tag 'pm-5.2-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pu..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13470eb2a00000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=56f1da14935c3cce
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=afabda3890cc2f765041
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=15100a91a00000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10c46026a00000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+afabda3890cc2f765041@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ffffffffda RBX: 00000000006fbc38 RCX: 0000000000446a79
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff888118137680 (size 1352):
> comm "syz-executor360", pid 7164, jiffies 4294941839 (age 13.960s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> ac 14 ff aa 0a 80 01 1a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 02 00 07 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...@............
> backtrace:
> [<000000006c358063>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive
> include/linux/kmemleak.h:43 [inline]
> [<000000006c358063>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
> [<000000006c358063>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline]
> [<000000006c358063>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x134/0x270 mm/slab.c:3488
> [<00000000f2fb26e7>] sk_prot_alloc+0x41/0x170 net/core/sock.c:1596
> [<000000003c036edc>] sk_alloc+0x35/0x2f0 net/core/sock.c:1656
> [<00000000c25725a4>] sctp_v4_create_accept_sk+0x32/0xb0
> net/sctp/protocol.c:556
> [<0000000049bd7e55>] sctp_accept+0x1df/0x290 net/sctp/socket.c:4913
> [<00000000d287a63e>] inet_accept+0x4e/0x1d0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:734
> [<00000000acb0fc20>] __sys_accept4+0x12a/0x280 net/socket.c:1760
> [<00000000bbdaf60b>] __do_sys_accept4 net/socket.c:1795 [inline]
> [<00000000bbdaf60b>] __se_sys_accept4 net/socket.c:1792 [inline]
> [<00000000bbdaf60b>] __x64_sys_accept4+0x22/0x30 net/socket.c:1792
> [<000000006da547ee>] do_syscall_64+0x76/0x1a0
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
> [<00000000025f5c93>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The same issue as "memory leak in sctp_v6_create_accept_sk" one.
Fix:
diff --git a/net/sctp/endpointola.c b/net/sctp/endpointola.c
index e358437..69cebb2 100644
--- a/net/sctp/endpointola.c
+++ b/net/sctp/endpointola.c
@@ -118,10 +118,6 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint
*sctp_endpoint_init(struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
/* Initialize the bind addr area */
sctp_bind_addr_init(&ep->base.bind_addr, 0);
- /* Remember who we are attached to. */
- ep->base.sk = sk;
- sock_hold(ep->base.sk);
-
/* Create the lists of associations. */
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->asocs);
@@ -154,6 +150,10 @@ static struct sctp_endpoint
*sctp_endpoint_init(struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
ep->prsctp_enable = net->sctp.prsctp_enable;
ep->reconf_enable = net->sctp.reconf_enable;
+ /* Remember who we are attached to. */
+ ep->base.sk = sk;
+ sock_hold(ep->base.sk);
+
return ep;
nomem_shkey:
>
>
>
> ---
> This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists