[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190624135729.q6k5hjq3ajwhi4gb@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:57:29 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Phong Tran <tranmanphong@...il.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
alexander.sverdlin@...il.com, allison@...utok.net, andrew@...n.ch,
ast@...nel.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, daniel@...que.org, dmg@...ingmachine.org,
festevam@...il.com, gerg@...inux.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
gregory.clement@...tlin.com, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, illusionist.neo@...il.com,
info@...ux.net, jason@...edaemon.net, jolsa@...hat.com,
kafai@...com, kernel@...gutronix.de, kgene@...nel.org,
krzk@...nel.org, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, liviu.dudau@....com,
lkundrak@...sk, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nsekhar@...com, peterz@...radead.org, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com, sudeep.holla@....com,
swinslow@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, tony@...mide.com,
will@...nel.org, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 12/15] ARM: vexpress: cleanup cppcheck shifting error
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:51:02PM +0700, Phong Tran wrote:
> [arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c:366]: (error) Shifting signed 32-bit value
> by 31 bits is undefined behaviour
>
> Signed-off-by: Phong Tran <tranmanphong@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> index 0f5381d13494..425ce633667a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/spc.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@
>
> /* SPC CPU/cluster reset statue */
> #define STANDBYWFI_STAT 0x3c
> -#define STANDBYWFI_STAT_A15_CPU_MASK(cpu) (1 << (cpu))
> -#define STANDBYWFI_STAT_A7_CPU_MASK(cpu) (1 << (3 + (cpu)))
> +#define STANDBYWFI_STAT_A15_CPU_MASK(cpu) BIT((cpu))
> +#define STANDBYWFI_STAT_A7_CPU_MASK(cpu) BIT((3 + (cpu)))
I guess you did this using a script, however, in the above two cases,
you don't need the extra parens - it was necessary in the original
though.
>
> /* SPC system config interface registers */
> #define SYSCFG_WDATA 0x70
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
> #define A7_PERFVAL_BASE 0xC30
>
> /* Config interface control bits */
> -#define SYSCFG_START (1 << 31)
> +#define SYSCFG_START BIT(31)
> #define SYSCFG_SCC (6 << 20)
> #define SYSCFG_STAT (14 << 20)
>
> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@
> #define CA15_DVFS 0
> #define CA7_DVFS 1
> #define SPC_SYS_CFG 2
> -#define STAT_COMPLETE(type) ((1 << 0) << (type << 2))
> -#define STAT_ERR(type) ((1 << 1) << (type << 2))
> +#define STAT_COMPLETE(type) (BIT(0) << (type << 2))
> +#define STAT_ERR(type) (BIT(1) << (type << 2))
> #define RESPONSE_MASK(type) (STAT_COMPLETE(type) | STAT_ERR(type))
>
> struct ve_spc_opp {
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void ve_spc_cpu_wakeup_irq(u32 cluster, u32 cpu, bool set)
> if (cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS)
> return;
>
> - mask = 1 << cpu;
> + mask = BIT(cpu);
>
> if (!cluster_is_a15(cluster))
> mask <<= 4;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists