[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190624170635.GA6413@chelsio.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:36:37 +0530
From: Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nirranjan@...lsio.com, dt@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] cxgb4: Reference count MPS TCAM entries
within a PF
On Monday, June 06/24/19, 2019 at 07:53:23 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > From: Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>
> > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:20:33 +0530
> >
> >> Firmware reference counts the MPS TCAM entries by PF and VF,
> >> but it does not do it for usage within a PF or VF. This patch
> >> adds the support to track MPS TCAM entries within a PF.
> >>
> >> v1->v2:
> >> Use refcount_t type instead of atomic_t for mps reference count
> >
> > Series applied, thanks.
>
> Umm, REALLY?!?!?!
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_mps.c: In function ‘cxgb4_mps_ref_dec_by_mac’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_mps.c:17:29: error: passing argument 1 of ‘atomic_dec_and_test’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&mps_entry->refcnt)) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> You just changed it to a refcount_t and didn't try compiling the
> result?
>
No. I'm pretty sure that I have compiled and tested the changes. But, my bad
I had missed to '--amend' the last patch after 'git add'.
I'll send out next version.
> The whole point of refcount_t is that it uses a different set of
> interfaces to manipulate the object and you have to therefore
> update all the call sites properly.
>
> Reverted...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists