[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF959A4-553C-441D-A8E7-53F325D3B272@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:34:33 +0000
From: "Patel, Vedang" <vedang.patel@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"Gomes, Vinicius" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"l@...ileo.org" <l@...ileo.org>,
"m-karicheri2@...com" <m-karicheri2@...com>,
"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com"
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/7] etf: Add skip_sock_check
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 2:40 PM, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:28:23 -0700, Vedang Patel wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h
>> index 8b2f993cbb77..409d1616472d 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h
>> @@ -990,6 +990,7 @@ struct tc_etf_qopt {
>> __u32 flags;
>> #define TC_ETF_DEADLINE_MODE_ON BIT(0)
>> #define TC_ETF_OFFLOAD_ON BIT(1)
>> +#define TC_ETF_SKIP_SOCK_CHECK BIT(2)
>> };
>>
>> enum {
>
> I think build bot complained about the code not building on 32bit.
> When you respin could you include a patch to remove the uses of BIT()
> in UAPI? See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg579344.html
Thanks for the info Jakub. Yeah I will include it in the next version.
-Vedang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists