[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00d101d52a32$bf483710$3dd8a530$@dektech.com.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:15:48 +0700
From: "Hoang Le" <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>
To: "'David Ahern'" <dsahern@...il.com>, <jon.maloy@...csson.com>,
<maloy@...jonn.com>, <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [iproute2-next v5] tipc: support interface name when activating UDP bearer
Thanks David. I will update code change as your comments.
For the item:
> + /* remove from cache */
> + ll_drop_by_index(ifr.ifr_ifindex);
why the call to ll_drop_by_index? doing so means that ifindex is looked
up again.
[Hoang]
> + ifr.ifr_ifindex = ll_name_to_index(ifr.ifr_name);
This function stored an entry ll_cache in hash map table. We have to call this function to prevent memory leaked.
Regards,
Hoang
-----Original Message-----
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 5:50 AM
To: Hoang Le <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>; dsahern@...il.com; jon.maloy@...csson.com; maloy@...jonn.com; ying.xue@...driver.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [iproute2-next v5] tipc: support interface name when activating UDP bearer
On 6/13/19 2:07 AM, Hoang Le wrote:
> @@ -119,6 +121,74 @@ static int generate_multicast(short af, char *buf, int bufsize)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct ifreq ifr = {};
you don't need to initialize globals, but you could pass a a struct as
the arg to the filter here which is both the addr buffer and the ifindex
of interest.
> +static int nl_dump_addr_filter(struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct ifaddrmsg *ifa = NLMSG_DATA(nlh);
> + char *r_addr = (char *)arg;
> + int len = nlh->nlmsg_len;
> + struct rtattr *addr_attr;
> +
> + if (ifr.ifr_ifindex != ifa->ifa_index)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (strlen(r_addr) > 0)
> + return 1;
> +
> + addr_attr = parse_rtattr_one(IFA_ADDRESS, IFA_RTA(ifa),
> + len - NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(*ifa)));
> + if (!addr_attr)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (ifa->ifa_family == AF_INET) {
> + struct sockaddr_in ip4addr;
> + memcpy(&ip4addr.sin_addr, RTA_DATA(addr_attr),
> + sizeof(struct in_addr));
> + if (inet_ntop(AF_INET, &ip4addr.sin_addr, r_addr,
> + INET_ADDRSTRLEN) == NULL)
> + return 0;
> + } else if (ifa->ifa_family == AF_INET6) {
> + struct sockaddr_in6 ip6addr;
> + memcpy(&ip6addr.sin6_addr, RTA_DATA(addr_attr),
> + sizeof(struct in6_addr));
> + if (inet_ntop(AF_INET6, &ip6addr.sin6_addr, r_addr,
> + INET6_ADDRSTRLEN) == NULL)
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int cmd_bearer_validate_and_get_addr(const char *name, char *r_addr)
> +{
> + struct rtnl_handle rth ={ .fd = -1 };
space between '={'
> +
> + memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(ifr));
> + if (!name || !r_addr || get_ifname(ifr.ifr_name, name))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ifr.ifr_ifindex = ll_name_to_index(ifr.ifr_name);
> + if (!ifr.ifr_ifindex)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* remove from cache */
> + ll_drop_by_index(ifr.ifr_ifindex);
why the call to ll_drop_by_index? doing so means that ifindex is looked
up again.
> +
> + if (rtnl_open(&rth, 0) < 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (rtnl_addrdump_req(&rth, AF_UNSPEC, 0) < 0) {
If you pass a filter here to set ifa_index, this command on newer
kernels will be much more efficient. See ipaddr_dump_filter.
> + rtnl_close(&rth);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (rtnl_dump_filter(&rth, nl_dump_addr_filter, r_addr) < 0) {
> + rtnl_close(&rth);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + rtnl_close(&rth);
> + return 1;
> +}
it would better to have 1 exit with the rtnl_close and return rc based
on above.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists