[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190624094233.3xick3snqbcm55gu@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:42:33 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Parshuram Raju Thombare <pthombar@...ence.com>
Cc: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafal Ciepiela <rafalc@...ence.com>,
Anil Joy Varughese <aniljoy@...ence.com>,
Piotr Sroka <piotrs@...ence.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] net: macb: add support for c45 PHY
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 06:47:48AM +0000, Parshuram Raju Thombare wrote:
> >Which Clause 45 PHY are you using?
>
> I am using emulated PHY in our CSP environment.
Concentrated Solar Power? Chartered Society of Physiotherapy? Center
for Space Physics?
Sorry, I don't know what a "CSP environment" is in this context, neither
it seems does google. TLAs in general tend to be bad when it comes to
communication.
However, it seems from that comment that you're not talking about real
hardware. Is there no real hardware out there supporting 10G mode with
these proposed driver changes yet?
> This is using 10G generic PHY driver, with PHY having compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"
The generic 10G PHY driver is really dumb and basic - it only supports
a very basic 10G mode.
>
> Hi Andrew,
> Can I add your "Reviewed-by" tag for this patch. You added it to this patch in last series.
>
> Regards,
> Parshuram Thombare
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists