[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4489696.oEgVQY3s1y@diego>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:50:34 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stmmac regression on ASUS TinkerBoard
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019, 09:46:12 CEST schrieb Jose Abreu:
> From: Katsuhiro Suzuki <katsuhiro@...suster.net>
>
> > I checked drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c and found
> > stmmac_init_phy() is going to fail if ethernet device node does not
> > have following property:
> > - phy-handle
> > - phy
> > - phy-device
> >
> > This commit broke the device-trees such as TinkerBoard. The mdio
> > subnode creating a mdio bus is changed to required or still optional?
>
> Yeah, with PHYLINK the PHY binding is always required ...
>
> How do you want to proceed ? I think DT bindings can never break between
> releases so I will probably need to cook a patch for stmmac.
Correct ... old devicetrees on new kernels should not break.
Especially as this affects a big number of boards potentially loosing
network support and in the devicetree binding the phy property is also
marked as optional.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists