netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: Add selftests for bpf_perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <260b127d-ee1b-3f62-5bc6-f9e7b339705f@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:40:18 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     allanzhang <allanzhang@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: Add selftests for bpf_perf_event_output

On 06/25/2019 01:57 AM, allanzhang wrote:
> Software event output is only enabled by a few prog types.
> This test is to ensure that all supported types are enbled for

Nit, typo: enbled

> bpf_perf_event_output sucessfully.

Nit, typo: sucessfully

> Signed-off-by: allanzhang <allanzhang@...gle.com>

For SOB, could you add proper formatted name before the email?

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   | 33 ++++++-
>  .../selftests/bpf/verifier/event_output.c     | 94 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/event_output.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> index c5514daf8865..901a188e1eea 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>  #define MAX_INSNS	BPF_MAXINSNS
>  #define MAX_TEST_INSNS	1000000
>  #define MAX_FIXUPS	8
> -#define MAX_NR_MAPS	18
> +#define MAX_NR_MAPS	19
>  #define MAX_TEST_RUNS	8
>  #define POINTER_VALUE	0xcafe4all
>  #define TEST_DATA_LEN	64
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
>  	int fixup_map_array_wo[MAX_FIXUPS];
>  	int fixup_map_array_small[MAX_FIXUPS];
>  	int fixup_sk_storage_map[MAX_FIXUPS];
> +	int fixup_map_event_output[MAX_FIXUPS];
>  	const char *errstr;
>  	const char *errstr_unpriv;
>  	uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv, insn_processed;
> @@ -604,6 +605,28 @@ static int create_sk_storage_map(void)
>  	return fd;
>  }
>  
> +static int create_event_output_map(void)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_create_map_attr attr = {
> +		.name = "test_map",
> +		.map_type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY,
> +		.key_size = 4,
> +		.value_size = 4,
> +		.max_entries = 1,
> +	};
> +	int fd, btf_fd;
> +
> +	btf_fd = load_btf();
> +	if (btf_fd < 0)
> +		return -1;
> +	attr.btf_fd = btf_fd;
> +	fd = bpf_create_map_xattr(&attr);

This does not look correct, BTF for spinlock does not belong to perf event array.

> +	close(attr.btf_fd);
> +	if (fd < 0)
> +		printf("Failed to create event_output\n");
> +	return fd;
> +}
> +
>  static char bpf_vlog[UINT_MAX >> 8];
>  
>  static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
> @@ -627,6 +650,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
>  	int *fixup_map_array_wo = test->fixup_map_array_wo;
>  	int *fixup_map_array_small = test->fixup_map_array_small;
>  	int *fixup_sk_storage_map = test->fixup_sk_storage_map;
> +	int *fixup_map_event_output = test->fixup_map_event_output;
>  
>  	if (test->fill_helper) {
>  		test->fill_insns = calloc(MAX_TEST_INSNS, sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
> @@ -788,6 +812,13 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
>  			fixup_sk_storage_map++;
>  		} while (*fixup_sk_storage_map);
>  	}
> +	if (*fixup_map_event_output) {
> +		map_fds[18] = create_event_output_map();
> +		do {
> +			prog[*fixup_map_event_output].imm = map_fds[18];
> +			fixup_map_event_output++;
> +		} while (*fixup_map_event_output);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int set_admin(bool admin)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/event_output.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/event_output.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b25eabcfaa56
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/event_output.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> +/* instructions used to output a skb based software event, produced
> + * from code snippet:
> +struct TMP {
> +  uint64_t tmp;
> +} tt;
> +tt.tmp = 5;
> +bpf_perf_event_output(skb, &connection_tracking_event_map, 0,
> +		      &tt, sizeof(tt));
> +return 1;
[...]