netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Add BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE support in bpftool cgroup [show|tree]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d44d265-7133-d191-beeb-c22dde73993f@fb.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:21:57 +0000
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@...com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Add BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE support in
 bpftool cgroup [show|tree]

On 6/24/19 5:16 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:38:11 +0000, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> I don't think this patch should be penalized.
>> I'd rather see we fix them all.
> 
> So we are going to add this broken option just to remove it?
> I don't understand.
> I'm happy to spend the 15 minutes rewriting this if you don't
> want to penalize Takshak.

hmm. I don't understand the 'broken' part.
The only issue I see that it could have been local vs global,
but they all should have been local.