[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91260adb2227e477647afda66fdff9d9a9f52c60.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:01:58 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "jes.sorensen@...il.com" <jes.sorensen@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "kernel-team@...com" <kernel-team@...com>,
"jsorensen@...com" <jsorensen@...com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mlx5: Fix build when CONFIG_MLX5_EN_RXNFC is disabled
On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 13:34 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:27:08 -0400
>
> > From: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@...com>
> >
> > The previous patch broke the build with a static declaration for
> > a public function.
> >
> > Fixes: 8f0916c6dc5c (net/mlx5e: Fix ethtool rxfh commands when
> > CONFIG_MLX5_EN_RXNFC is disabled)
> > Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@...com>
>
> Saeed, I'm assuming I will get this via your next pull request once
> things
> are sorted.
>
Well, i think there is no issue in upstream, but yes basically you can
delegate this to me.
BTW is there a way to clear up "Awaiting Upstream" clutter [1] for mlx5
patches that are already pulled ?
[1]
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=&submitter=&state=8&q=mlx5&archive=&delegate=
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists