lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:26:32 +0100
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: unprivileged BPF access via /dev/bpf

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 16:19, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote:
> > I know nothing about the scheduler, so pardon my ignorance. Does
> > TASK_BPF_FLAG_PERMITTED apply per user-space process, or per thread?
>
> It is per thread. clone() also clears the bit. I will make it more
> clear int the commit log.

In that case this is going to be very hard if not impossible to use
from languages that
don't allow controlling threads, aka Go. I'm sure there are other
examples as well.

Is it possible to make this per-process instead?

-- 
Lorenz Bauer  |  Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK

www.cloudflare.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ