[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSc7Gt0v8_KGEibC_8LKAe-yvL10KuJeoiAdYFDiED-5cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:35:59 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 7:40 AM Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019/06/26 09:36, Manish Chopra wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 1:19 PM
> > > To: Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>; GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-
> > > NIC-Dev@...vell.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size
> > >
> > > External Email
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Tx rings have sbq_buf_size = 0 but there's no case where the code actually
> > > tests on that value. We can remove sbq_buf_size and use a constant instead.
> > >
> >
> > Seems relevant to RX ring, not the TX ring ?
>
> qlge uses "struct rx_ring" for rx and for tx completion rings.
>
> The driver's author is probably laughing now at the success of his plan
> to confuse those who would follow in his footsteps.
:-)
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists